top of page

Beyond Morale: The Hard Business Case for Inclusive Leadership


black mug with the phrase Lead. Win. Referencing support for the necessity of  inclusive leadership

In today's evolving work landscape, the role of managers extends far beyond task delegation and performance reviews. Modern managers must become architects of inclusive environments where every team member feels genuinely heard, respected, and valued. Creating these inclusive environments isn't just a moral imperative—it's a business necessity that directly impacts productivity, retention, and organizational success.



The Current State of Workplace Engagement and Inclusion

The statistics paint a clear picture of the challenges we face. Only 23% of employees globally are classified as engaged, according to Gallup's 2024 Global Workplace Report. This means that a staggering 77% of the global workforce is either not engaged or actively disengaged from their work.


Even more concerning is the state of psychological safety in our workplaces. Only 68% of employed individuals consider their workplace psychologically safe, while 23% believe it is not. When we consider that 84% of employees value psychological safety as one of the most important aspects of their workplace, the gap between employee expectations and workplace reality becomes stark.


However, there's hope in the data. Inclusive workplaces experience 12% higher engagement rates, demonstrating that when managers prioritize inclusion, the engagement benefits are measurable and significant.


The Financial Impact of Getting This Wrong

The cost of disengagement and exclusion extends far beyond hurt feelings or reduced morale. Gallup estimates that if every organization reached the same engagement levels as today's best-practice companies, the world economy could grow by an additional $9.6 trillion.


At the individual organization level, the costs are equally substantial:

  • Turnover costs: Hiring new employees can cost 1.5–2 times someone's annual salary

  • Productivity losses: Disengaged employees are 18% less productive than their engaged counterparts


When managers fail to create inclusive environments, they're not just failing their teams—they are also failing their organization's bottom line.


What Psychological Safety Really Means

Psychological safety, a concept pioneered by Harvard Business School professor Amy Edmondson, is the belief that one can speak up, ask questions, admit mistakes, and express concerns without fear of negative consequences. Organizations must build all other inclusion efforts" on the foundation of psychological safety.


In psychologically safe environments, team members:

  • Feel comfortable expressing dissenting opinions

  • Admit mistakes without fear of punishment

  • Ask questions without worrying about appearing incompetent

  • Take calculated risks knowing they won't be penalized for honest failures

  • Bring their authentic selves to work


Psychological safety isn't about creating a consequence-free environment where performance doesn't matter. Instead, psychological safety is about separating the person from the mistake, focusing on learning rather than blame, and creating conditions that enable people to perform at their best.


Understanding True Inclusion vs. Surface-Level Diversity

Many organizations confuse diversity initiatives with inclusion efforts, but they're fundamentally different concepts. Diversity is about representation—who's in the room. Inclusion is about participation—whose voices are heard, valued, and acted upon once they're in that room.


True inclusion means:

  • Equitable participation: Everyone has genuine opportunities to contribute and influence decisions

  • Value for differences: Diverse perspectives are seen as assets, not obstacles to overcome

  • Systemic support: Policies, practices, and cultural norms actively support all team members

  • Belonging: People feel they can be authentic without conforming to a dominant culture


Surface-level diversity efforts may attract people to the organization, but without inclusion, those same individuals often leave. The lack of inclusion creates a costly revolving door that undermines both diversity goals and team stability.


The Ripple Effect of Inclusive Leadership

When managers commit to creating psychologically safe and inclusive environments, the effects extend far beyond their immediate teams. Inclusive workplaces demonstrate measurably higher engagement rates compared to non-inclusive environments.


The Manager's Critical Role

Research consistently shows that managers have more impact on employee engagement and inclusion than any other single factor. People don't leave companies—they leave managers. And people don't feel excluded by organizations—they feel excluded by their immediate work environment and the relationships within it.

The research on the impact of managers places enormous responsibility on them, but it also represents a tremendous opportunity. Unlike changing entire organizational cultures, managers can directly influence their team's experience from the start.


Managers who successfully create inclusive environments share several key characteristics:

  • They model vulnerability and admit their own mistakes

  • They actively seek out and value diverse perspectives

  • They respond to challenges with curiosity rather than defensiveness

  • They invest time in understanding each team member as an individual

  • They recognize that inclusion is an ongoing practice, not a one-time training



Scrabble tiles spell "BE THE CHANGE" on a white background. The wooden tiles have black letters and score numbers. Motivational mood.

Building Your Foundation for Change

Creating safe and inclusive workplaces starts with honest self-reflection. Before implementing new practices or policies, successful managers examine their own assumptions, biases, and habits to ensure they are informed and effective.


Consider these foundational questions:

  • How do I typically respond when someone disagrees with me?

  • Do I notice patterns in whose ideas get implemented or whose voices dominate meetings?

  • What assumptions do I make about team members based on their backgrounds or communication styles?

  • How comfortable am I with admitting when I don't know something or have made a mistake?

The answers to these questions reveal starting points for growth and change.


The Path Forward

The data is clear: organizations and teams with inclusive leaders consistently outperform those without. The question isn't whether inclusion matters—it's how quickly and effectively managers can build these capabilities.


Creating psychologically safe and inclusive environments requires daily commitment, continuous learning, and the courage to examine and change practices that may not be serving all team members effectively. Building inclusive workplaces is not a destination but an ongoing journey that begins with a single step.


The statistics make clear that the majority of workplaces still have significant room for improvement. However, managers who embrace this challenge have the opportunity to create environments where every team member can thrive. In doing so, they not only improve the lives of their team members but also drive meaningful business results that benefit everyone.


Understanding the "why" behind inclusive leadership is the first step. The next step is learning exactly how to put these principles into practice.


In our next post, we'll provide six essential actions managers can take to build safe and inclusive teams, complete with a comprehensive implementation checklist and measurement strategies.
 
 
bottom of page